Synthetic Images: Generative AI vs Photorealistic CG

Understanding the Premium Choice for Mission-Critical Inspections

Choose the right approach for your synthetic training data. Learn why photorealistic CG is the premium option for demanding machine vision applications that require precision and reliability.

Schedule Consultation →

The Fundamental Difference

Two approaches to synthetic data generation, each with distinct advantages and limitations

Generative AI Approach

Uses neural networks to create synthetic images by learning from existing datasets. Fast and flexible, but limited by training data quality and prone to hallucinations.

Photorealistic CG Approach

Uses physics-based rendering engines to create mathematically accurate representations of real-world objects and lighting conditions. Precise but computationally intensive.

Compare

Generative AI vs Photorealistic CG (Quick Compare)

Attribute Generative AI Photorealistic CG
Realism Yes, but artifacts Yes, physics-accurate
Defect control No Yes
Pixel-perfect annotations No Yes
Repeatability No Yes
Rare defect coverage Partial Yes
CAD & workflow integration No Yes
Compliance-ready No Yes
Best for regulated use No Yes

Detailed Feature Comparison

Why photorealistic CG is the premium choice for mission-critical applications

Realism

Generative AI

High visual realism, but can introduce artifacts or "hallucinations."

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Physically accurate rendering based on CAD and material properties; matches real-world optics.

Defect Control

Generative AI

Limited. Hard to specify exact size, depth, or placement of defects.

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Precise control over defect parameters (scratch length, dent depth, particle size, distribution).

Annotations

Generative AI

Often requires manual labeling; outputs can be inconsistent.

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Pixel-perfect ground truth (segmentation, depth, normals, masks) generated automatically.

Repeatability

Generative AI

Randomized results, difficult to reproduce exact scenarios.

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Deterministic; the same setup always produces identical results if required.

Coverage of Rare Defects

Generative AI

Can generate variations, but lacks engineering accuracy for edge cases.

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Any rare or critical defect can be modeled to spec—even if never seen in real life.

Integration

Generative AI

Works well for data augmentation, less suited for precise engineering requirements.

Photorealistic CG PREMIUM

Seamless integration with CAD workflows and existing quality control processes.

When to Choose Each Approach

Understanding the right tool for your specific needs

Choose Generative AI When:

  • • You need quick data augmentation
  • • Visual similarity is more important than physical accuracy
  • • Budget constraints are primary concern
  • • Working with simple, well-defined objects
  • • Tolerance for some inaccuracies is acceptable

Choose Photorealistic CG When:

  • Mission-critical inspections require perfect accuracy
  • You need precise defect control and measurement
  • Working with complex geometries and materials
  • Regulatory compliance demands traceable results
  • You require pixel-perfect ground truth annotations
  • Long-term repeatability is essential